It's sad when . . .
... you get more coverage of privacy issues in Popular Mechanics than you do on network news.
I guess there's something to that whole technogeek/libertarian correlation thing after all.
P.S. The same issue contains this excellent editorial, which reminds us, among other things, that:
Police cars have dashboard cameras, cities and counties are posting red-light and speed-limit cameras, and it seems that the dream of many government officials is to put every public space under 24-hour video watch. But try shooting photos or video of police or other public officials as they go about their business and you might find yourself in wrist restraints.
Supporters of widespread surveillance often argue, "If you're obeying the law, you have nothing to fear." Why shouldn't the same go for police officers?