F*ck you, too, WaPo.
Washington Post calls Ron Paul "clutter."
I'm curious. What were Bill Clinton's poll numbers at this time during the 1992 election cycle? Had anyone outside of Arkansas heard of him, apart from that interminably long convention speech?
We don't need you to filter out our options, WaPo.
In fact, we don't need you for much of anything.
Not even for asswipe, because I would think that after wiping with WaPo, one's ass would be dirtier than it was BEFORE wiping.
UPDATE: Technorati affirms Ron Paul's online support is genuine. See, we told you so, Retards in Pajamas!
'NUTHER UPDATE:
I'm curious. What were Bill Clinton's poll numbers at this time during the 1992 election cycle? Had anyone outside of Arkansas heard of him, apart from that interminably long convention speech?
We don't need you to filter out our options, WaPo.
In fact, we don't need you for much of anything.
Not even for asswipe, because I would think that after wiping with WaPo, one's ass would be dirtier than it was BEFORE wiping.
UPDATE: Technorati affirms Ron Paul's online support is genuine. See, we told you so, Retards in Pajamas!
'NUTHER UPDATE:
Click pic.
Labels: Bill Clinton, debates, Ron Paul, Washington Post
posted by The Last American at 9:00:00 AM
View blog reactions
2 Comments:
The Washington Post is the same publicationt hat is always supporting A McCain type "Campaign finance reorm bill", yet when a candidate who isn't beholden to corporate welfare comes along, the Post absoltutely trashes the guys. UNBELIEVABLE how blatantly biased these media sources are. ABC, Washington Post etc you are really sickening organizations.
Amen! WaPo and the rest of the crapass mainstream days are numbered anyways, soon they won't be able to give papers and their crap editorials away.
Post a Comment
<< Home