Granted, it's not scientific.
But at least when I post a poll on Topix, it gets responses (unlike here). Here is the result of my latest poll there.
P.S. You can vote in the NEXT poll here.
Labels: deficit spending, online polls, polls
But at least when I post a poll on Topix, it gets responses (unlike here). Here is the result of my latest poll there.
P.S. You can vote in the NEXT poll here.
Labels: deficit spending, online polls, polls
Multiblogger Kevin wonders over at Ten Second News why the disparity exists between Ron Paul's Internet popularity and real-world poll numbers, and partially explains it.
Labels: elections, Kevin Whited, online polls, polls, Ron Paul
Another one of those little snippets that bounces around nearly constantly in my head is "Answers can be incorrect, questions can't."
It draws a moral equivalency between government and property owners. It supposes that the two are either equally legitimate in enacting such a ban or equally illegitimate.
Of COURSE property owners should be able to institute such a ban in what is, after all, THEIR property.
But the government has no business telling the property owner what he can or cannot allow on his own property.
It would be akin to a parent saying "MTV is not allowed in this house." Does the government have an equal right to step in and say "MTV is not allowed in your house"? I don't think so.
On a barely related note, they haven't emailed me an activation code yet so I can post this point as a comment on their story.
Labels: bans, online polls, private property rights, smoking
Click pic to embiggen.
Labels: Libertarians, online polls, polling
I've created an online poll that actually encourages input from Ron Paul's supporters. Take a look over in the left-hand column, about halfway down. And vote (once per person, please).
Labels: online polls, polling, polls, Ron Paul, ron paul revolution