Here's another one of those Esquire-esque questions.
Is taking land via eminent domain to build a private toll bridge a legitimate government function?
Labels: eminent domain
Is taking land via eminent domain to build a private toll bridge a legitimate government function?
Labels: eminent domain
. . . where it allows size restrictions on the Freedom of Speech.
Labels: eminent domain, First Amendment, free speech, zoning
You know, like the one that says Brad Pitt died today in a fall on the set of his new movie.
Labels: eminent domain
After all, he can't object. He is, after all, pro-stealing.
Trueblood staged a protest at the hotel Friday and might make the protests a weekly effort.
He’s also circulating an online petition. In it, he urges the city council and city manager to take the hotel through eminent domain and find a developer who will “restore the hotel to its original splendor and purpose.”
Labels: eminent domain
Richard Stark comes up with a solution to the eminent domainers:
According to the Jamestown, N.D., Sun, Richard Starke sent an e-mail to the
North Dakota Public Service Commission and said “As long as our (Public)
Keystone Affairs Commission is in their pockets for millions in bribes, and
landowners do not take steps to blow them up with several sacks of fertilizer
and a gallon of diesel fuel, they will continue to exploit us.”
Labels: eminent domain
Buried in this piece about why it's taking longer for Marshall and H4H to build a Habitat house than it should [emphasis mine.]:
"We're certainly not stalling for any particular reason other than people have to understand and be patient," he said. "When we entered into this partnership with the city of the Artisan Avenue redevelopment project, we took on the challenge of building five homes there. This being the first of five. When anytime you are claiming a piece of property off of eminent domain these are the types of obstacles an organization has to face."
Labels: eminent domain, Habitat for Humanity, Jimmy Carter, landthieves
. . . before Kevin sees it and has a seizure.
The coalition would amend the Constitutionto not allow[to bar] the taking of private property for the use of another private entity, would narrow the definition of what are legitimate uses "for the public good" and force government entities to negotiate buyout prices based on all aspects of a business' worth — such as Bryant's 15-year rental contracts.
Labels: eminent domain, Kevin Whited, Mis-Leader, split infinitives
Just moved Minnesota from the "Rocks!" column to the "Sucks!" column.
The Minnesota Twins will break ground Aug. 30 on a new $522-million baseball stadium, though first a moderating panel will decide Monday how much the current property owners will be compensated for the site, on Third Avenue between Fifth and Seventh streets. Hennepin County has acquired the site, a former parking lot and rail line, through eminent domain, but is arguing before the panel that the land is only worth about $14 million, and not the $65 million the owners claim.
Labels: eminent domain, landthieves, Why Minnesota Sucks
Oklahoma State: sports more important than property rights.
Labels: commies, eminent domain
Not on YouTube. Go here,then click on Maharishi Vedic City Blues.
Labels: eminent domain, Song of the Day
And you thought eminent domain only happened in the brick and mortar world. Remind you of anyone, specifically the looter class in ATLAS SHRUGGED?
Labels: ATlas Shrugged, eminent domain, Save the drama for Obama